Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Neural Foundry's avatar

The Point in Time Count methodology always feels like a catch-22 for funding allocation. The HUD criteria exclude couch surfers, but those folks are often one argument away from the street, and the count misses them entirely. From what Ive seen in similar community initiatives, the real number is usually way higher than what gets reported, which means resources get allocated based on an incomplete picture of need.

Expand full comment

No posts

Ready for more?