Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sarah Cotner's avatar

A case of the court decision meeting the letter of the law - you should always record Virtual meetings or, at the very least, confirm what was discussed in a follow up e-mail. However, I don't feel that the city acted in good faith. As a commercial landlord, if I haven't received clear written notice one way or the other, I always check in with the organization at least a week prior to the deadline to see if I missed notice from them (e-mails can end up in junk mail & mailed letters can end up in the black hole that the Indianapolis distribution center has become), companies have turn over and simple clerical errors can be made, etc. If they haven't provided notice, I remind them of the due date and ask if I can provide any further information if they haven't made up their mind yet. Is it going above and beyond what is necessary? Sure, but I see it good business practice and acting in good faith. Obviously, there were issues with both sides not meeting expectations/promises and they city did not want to renew. However, refusing renewal on a technicality is a shitty thing to do. Unless there is an egregious contract violation that would give legitimate cause to deny renewal, landlords should be fair and not use petty reasons to refuse renewal.

Expand full comment

No posts